[git pull] 1.14 gpu fixes backport
Peter Hutterer
peter.hutterer at who-t.net
Mon Jul 22 16:56:50 PDT 2013
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 02:24:30AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2013-07-16 at 11:56 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> > On 07/13/2013 05:10 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sex, 2013-07-12 at 11:36 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > >> Hi Matt,
> > >>
> > >> all backports from master, all shipped in Fedora, all making Peter
> > >> angry because he had to rebase
> > >> them.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > with Fedora 19, we have a mass test of 1.14, so some bugs was found we
> > > have other 2 patches floating around .
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976995
> > > with patch
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=772539
> > >
> > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66851
> > > with patch
> > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=82364
> > >
> > > both seems easy patches ,
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have these in a branch I can either pull or cherry-pick?
>
> Hi, trying to help here ,
> I follow the bugs of xorg-x11-server on F19
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=xorg-x11-server&list_id=1540048&product=Fedora
>
> and what is upstream source:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/?h=server-1.14-branch
>
> I'm following this, since release 3 with VirtualBox fix (upstreamed):
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12681/xorg-x11-server-1.14.2-3.fc19
waiting in a pull request, will be upstream soon.
> next on release 4, Dave patch (upstreamed)
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12886/xorg-x11-server-1.14.2-4.fc19
punted to dave.
> and now release 5, other fixes
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12995/xorg-x11-server-1.14.2-5.fc19
these will be merged to 1.14 asap
> Now it seems that almost all bugs are fixed, but still left this 2
> patches, one in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976995
first half is I think the same as -4 above, punted to dave.
Xephyr flag which is 1.15.
> reporter says that still need it, easy to see that don't harm , so I
> think that Dave could decide and upstream it (or not). Same for other
> patch which is in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66851
punting...
Cheers,
Peter
> this patch is more complicated, to me, knowing if it is correct or not,
> but seems logic.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
>
> _______________________________________________
> xorg-devel at lists.x.org: X.Org development
> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
>
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list