[git pull] 1.14 gpu fixes backport

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2013-07-16 at 11:56 -0600, Matt Dew wrote: 
> On 07/13/2013 05:10 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sex, 2013-07-12 at 11:36 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> Hi Matt,
> >>
> >> all backports from master, all shipped in Fedora, all making Peter
> >> angry because he had to rebase
> >> them.
> >
> > Hi,
> > with Fedora 19, we have a mass test of 1.14, so some bugs was found we
> > have other 2 patches floating around .
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976995
> > with patch
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=772539
> >
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66851
> > with patch
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=82364
> >
> > both seems easy patches ,
> >
> >
> 
> 
> Does anyone have these in a branch I can either pull or cherry-pick?

Hi, trying to help here ,  
I follow the bugs of xorg-x11-server on F19 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=xorg-x11-server&list_id=1540048&product=Fedora

and what is upstream source:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/?h=server-1.14-branch 

I'm following this, since release 3 with VirtualBox fix (upstreamed):
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12681/xorg-x11-server-1.14.2-3.fc19

next on release 4, Dave patch (upstreamed)
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12886/xorg-x11-server-1.14.2-4.fc19

and now release 5, other fixes 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12995/xorg-x11-server-1.14.2-5.fc19

Now it seems that almost all bugs are fixed, but still left this 2
patches, one in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976995
reporter says that still need it, easy to see that don't harm , so I
think that Dave could decide and upstream it (or not). Same for other
patch which is in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66851 
this patch is more complicated, to me, knowing if it is correct or not,
but seems logic.

Best regards,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.