[PATCH 0/7] Resume breaking ABI
Keith Packard
keithp at keithp.com
Fri Oct 5 10:43:56 PDT 2012
Colin Harrison <colin.harrison at virgin.net> writes:
> Hi,
>> Probably needs to be 'unsigned int' instead. I still don't know if we
>> can use the enum type here.
> My compiler is happy with 'unsigned int', which is the safest bet I reckon
> for all (I had to dig out my K&R ANSI C on this...and read it once
> more!)
Care to submit a patch which updates all of the changed bitfields to
unsigned?
--
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20121005/23a256a5/attachment.pgp>
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list