libXft 2.3.0 not so good

[Alan Coopersmith]

Thanks for the fix!

On 03/12/12 11:58 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> The bold bug is fixed in git, but the other one I'm not so sure about.  I agree that the screenshots are different, but I'm no expert on what is "correct" so hopefully someone else with more font skills can chime in.
>
> --Jeremy
>
> On Mar 12, 2012, at 8:06 AM, Alan Coopersmith<alan.coopersmith at oracle.com>  wrote:
>
>> Distro makers probably want to hold off on packaging the 2.3.0 upgrade
>> until we get a 2.3.1 release out to fix:
>>
>> 	https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47178
>> 	https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47196
>>
>> (I guess no one noticed during the months the broken commits were sitting
>> in git, but throw out a tarball, and suddenly people use it.)
>>
>> --
>> 	-Alan Coopersmith-              alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
>> 	 Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
>> _______________________________________________
>> xorg-devel at lists.x.org: X.Org development
>> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
>> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
>>
>


-- 
	-Alan Coopersmith-              alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
	 Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc