libXft 2.3.0 not so good

[Jeremy Huddleston]

The bold bug is fixed in git, but the other one I'm not so sure about.  I agree that the screenshots are different, but I'm no expert on what is "correct" so hopefully someone else with more font skills can chime in.

--Jeremy

On Mar 12, 2012, at 8:06 AM, Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at oracle.com> wrote:

> Distro makers probably want to hold off on packaging the 2.3.0 upgrade
> until we get a 2.3.1 release out to fix:
> 
> 	https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47178
> 	https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47196
> 
> (I guess no one noticed during the months the broken commits were sitting
> in git, but throw out a tarball, and suddenly people use it.)
> 
> -- 
> 	-Alan Coopersmith-              alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
> 	 Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
> _______________________________________________
> xorg-devel at lists.x.org: X.Org development
> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
>