[PATCH] Add EXA support
michel at daenzer.net
Fri Jul 13 02:34:40 PDT 2012
On Don, 2012-07-12 at 15:00 -0700, Connor Behan wrote:
> On 11/07/12 08:13 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 16:44 -0700, Connor Behan wrote:
> >> On 06/07/12 03:52 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >>> On Don, 2012-07-05 at 17:51 -0700, Connor Behan wrote:
> >>>> For real this time. This allows the r128 driver to continue having 2D
> >>> That this patch is for the r128 driver should be mentioned on the
> >>> subject line (even if it was submitted to the xorg-driver-ati list :),
> >>> e.g. as '[PATCH xf86-video-r128] ...'
> >>> OTOH it doesn't need to be mentioned in the Git commit log, which is
> >>> everything between the Subject: line and the '---' line. You can include
> >>> additional information for the patch submission between the latter and
> >>> the actual patch.
> >> I just uploaded a patch to the bug tracker which gets rid of the
> >> warnings and uses better conventions for the subject line and commit
> >> summary. Should I send it to this list or xorg-driver-ati?
> > I think the latter would be better, but either is fine.
> > BTW, extra points for stripping the unrelated PLL and other
> > whitespace-only changes from the patch. :) Otherwise it looks pretty
> > good at a quick glance.
> The PLL stuff was to fix debug mode so I just made it a separate patch
> -- they apply in either order.
Cool. I probably won't get around to applying the patches before next
week, maybe someone else beats me to it.
> I'm embarrassing myself trying to send the main patch xorg-driver-ati.
> The list tells me that the message is too long even if I regenerate it
> with "git format-patch --attach".
No worries, I approved it.
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the xorg-devel