[PATCH] Add EXA support
connor.behan at gmail.com
Thu Jul 12 15:00:34 PDT 2012
On 11/07/12 08:13 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 16:44 -0700, Connor Behan wrote:
>> On 06/07/12 03:52 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On Don, 2012-07-05 at 17:51 -0700, Connor Behan wrote:
>>>> For real this time. This allows the r128 driver to continue having 2D
>>> That this patch is for the r128 driver should be mentioned on the
>>> subject line (even if it was submitted to the xorg-driver-ati list :),
>>> e.g. as '[PATCH xf86-video-r128] ...'
>>> OTOH it doesn't need to be mentioned in the Git commit log, which is
>>> everything between the Subject: line and the '---' line. You can include
>>> additional information for the patch submission between the latter and
>>> the actual patch.
>> I just uploaded a patch to the bug tracker which gets rid of the
>> warnings and uses better conventions for the subject line and commit
>> summary. Should I send it to this list or xorg-driver-ati?
> I think the latter would be better, but either is fine.
> BTW, extra points for stripping the unrelated PLL and other
> whitespace-only changes from the patch. :) Otherwise it looks pretty
> good at a quick glance.
The PLL stuff was to fix debug mode so I just made it a separate patch
-- they apply in either order. I'm embarrassing myself trying to send
the main patch xorg-driver-ati. The list tells me that the message is
too long even if I regenerate it with "git format-patch --attach".
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 554 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the xorg-devel