[PATCH inputproto] Add minimal asciidoc syntax

Gaetan Nadon memsize at videotron.ca
Wed Mar 16 09:54:51 PDT 2011

On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 03:29 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:

> I'm all for keeping it easy for the devs to edit and review patches.
> I 
> have a nervous twitch in my stomach about format proliferation
> though. 
> I do not want to end up back where we were a year ago.

I was somewhat concerned about that, but I don't see a line-up of people
new docs. On the other hand, getting any documentation to be written, in
any format,
has always been a challenge for any software project. It's a risk I am
willing to take.

While on the subject, the following protos have their original txt file.
Any candidates for docbook/asciidoc conversion. I know I have been
asking this
before and I was told there were "no plans" for doing it. This was
before the docbook
conversion. Perhaps now would be a good time to have a plan.

They just look silly now that every thing else is converted.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20110316/78ce40e5/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20110316/78ce40e5/attachment.pgp>

More information about the xorg-devel mailing list