<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8"> <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.26.0"> </HEAD> <BODY> On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 03:29 -0600, Matt Dew wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <TT>I'm all for keeping it easy for the devs to edit and review patches.  I </TT> <TT>have a nervous twitch in my stomach about format proliferation though. </TT> <TT>I do not want to end up back where we were a year ago.</TT> </BLOCKQUOTE> I was somewhat concerned about that, but I don't see a line-up of people proposing new docs. On the other hand, getting any documentation to be written, in any format, has always been a challenge for any software project. It's a risk I am willing to take. While on the subject, the following protos have their original txt file. Any candidates for docbook/asciidoc conversion. I know I have been asking this before and I was told there were "no plans" for doing it. This was before the docbook conversion. Perhaps now would be a good time to have a plan. They just look silly now that every thing else is converted. <BLOCKQUOTE> <PRE> compositeproto.txt damageproto.txt dri2proto.txt fixesproto.txt randrproto.txt renderproto.txt xv-protocol-v2.txt </PRE> </BLOCKQUOTE> </BODY> </HTML>