[PATCH:libXt] Add test framework similar to xserver and use it to test XtAsprintf

Gaetan Nadon memsize at videotron.ca
Tue Mar 8 17:28:10 PST 2011

On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 00:39 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:

> I could understand why people wouldn't want glib to be pulled in
> unconditionally when building libxt. As a package maintainer, I'm
> happy to declare through a configure option that I want to enable unit
> tests, and make configure fail if the prerequisites aren't there.
> So I guess it makes sense (at least in this case) to have a
> --enable-unit-tests available.

Agreed. I had not thought about this. Thanks.

I'll proposed something along the lines of the doc tools macros to which
a few package maintainers contributed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20110308/5b25d17a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20110308/5b25d17a/attachment.pgp>

More information about the xorg-devel mailing list