[PATCH] modes: Replace xf86DefaultModes with DMTModes

[Mark Kettenis]

> From: Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:21:02 -0500
> 
> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 21:32 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 21:27:47 +0100 (CET)
> > > From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis at xs4all.nl>
> > >=20
> > > > From: Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com>
> > > > Date: Tue,  8 Mar 2011 14:56:33 -0500
> > > >=20
> > > > DMTModes is what xf86DefaultModes was always meant to be.
> > >=20
> > > I'd say xf86DefaultModes is a better variable name than DMTModes for
> > > an exported symbol though.
> 
> If it makes you feel better, we can probably stop exporting it.  None of
> the open drivers are using either symbol.  I think fglrx does, but the
> thing about MIT-licensed code is...

Somewhat.

> > Hmm, looking at this a bit more, is it really ok to include the
> > "reduced blanking" modes in xf86DefaultModes?
> 
> Yes.  We filter the default mode pool based on the monitor's
> capabilities.  For non-randrful drivers, see xf86CheckModeForMonitor;
> for randrful drivers see xf86ValidateModesReducedBlanking.  (Yes, these
> paths should be made less redundant.)

Thanks for the expanation.