setxkbmap: Refactoring for better style and maintainability?
Daniel Stone
daniel at fooishbar.org
Mon Feb 14 04:37:49 PST 2011
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 03:55:16AM +0300, Van de Bugger wrote:
> Advantages are obvious: better maintainability due to (1) better type
> control from compiler (because the first argument is of unique type, not
> widely used "faceless" int), (2) not using global variables, etc.
>
> Who is the maintainer of setxkbmap? Would you accept such fix?
Yeah, setxkbmap is pretty rubbish. I guess I'm probably the current
maintainer, and am not really doing much anything with it, as it does,
for all its faults, work. So yeah, feel free, and thanks. :)
Cheers,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20110214/8b1ffb9a/attachment.pgp>
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list