X server 1.10 development cycle

[Keith Packard]

On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:23:27 +0300, Tiago Vignatti <tiago.vignatti at nokia.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 08:41:15PM +0200, ext Keith Packard wrote:
> > 
> > Merging the protocol headers into a single package would be a good step, but
> > it would require someone to step up and offer to take charge of doing
> > release management for the whole thing.
> 
> I thought you were "almost there". Could you elaborate a bit more what was the
> state of your last attempt please?

Technically, I think we can merge the repositories easily; I've got
scripts that do the bulk of the work. The questions left were mostly
procedural -- we need someone to do release management for the headers,
and if we're integrating a ton of different extensions, that will take
some care.

> what would be the viable option for closed drivers in this case?

I don't see that they have much relevance in this discussion; they won't
get integrated anyway.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100913/ad62b00b/attachment.pgp>