[RFC] merged void driver

[Daniel Stone]

On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 05:17:31PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 11:13:09AM -0500, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 04:01:18PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> > > I believe that differences in driver APIs should be a build-time 
> > > thing, for all currently used versions of X. I personally find 
> > > compatibility up to debian stable a very commendable and defendable 
> > > goal.
> > 
> > Yes, and that's OK.  No-one begrudges you that.  But on the other hand,
> > other people have different opinions too, so 'I'm clearly right, anyone
> > who disagrees with me hates the Linux desktop, freedom and/or users'
> > isn't really a productive attitude.
> 
> Ignoring the rest of the email, and just singling out this one 
> statement, which is mostly about describing the position from which i 
> am looking at this situation, is also not too productive.

Yes, I could've replied to the entire mail, in which you restate
everything you've previously said, and restated everything I've
previously said (as well as everything Peter's previously said).  But
what's the point?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20101107/301dc430/attachment.pgp>