clang static analysis of xorg-server
Matthias Hopf
mhopf at suse.de
Mon Mar 22 10:25:13 PDT 2010
On Mar 22, 10 09:58:59 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> I ran the static analyzer on a build of the current git master of xorg-server. Here are the results:
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~jeremyhu/clang/2010-03-22-1/
> There are quite a number of hidden issues. Would people find it useful to have this data part of tinderbox.x.org? If so, I'll look into seeing how easily it would be to integrate clang into jhbuild.
While 'rand is a poor random generator' and 'Dead assignment' are
questionable, at least some of the NULL pointer accesses seem real.
It might be interesting to have this on tinderbox, however, there should
be a possibility to mark false positives (like the use of rand() in not
security critical code). Any ideas?
Thanks for the test
Matthias
--
Matthias Hopf <mhopf at suse.de> __ __ __
Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__ mat at mshopf.de
Phone +49-911-74053-715 __) |_| __) |__ R & D www.mshopf.de
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list