[PATCH] mi: rename miPointerMoved to miPointerMoveNoEvent.
Peter Hutterer
peter.hutterer at who-t.net
Sun Jul 4 05:16:55 PDT 2010
On 3/07/10 02:22 , Keith Packard wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:31:19 +1000, Peter Hutterer<peter.hutterer at who-t.net> wrote:
>> Having miPointerMove and miPointerMoved is confusing, especially since both
>> do the same thing bar the event delivery. Also, miPointerMove calls
>> miPointerMoved which indicates some confusion in the temporal alignment of
>> cause and effect.
>
> <Bikeshed>
> Should we rename miPointerMove too? Perhaps miPointerMoveWithEvent and
> miPointerMoveWithoutEvent?
> </bikeshed>
meh.
I think it's fine as it is. moving the pointer always generates an
event, the exception being miPointerMoveNoEvent, explicitly labeled so.
Cheers,
Peter
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list