[PATCH] mi: rename miPointerMoved to miPointerMoveNoEvent.

[Keith Packard]

On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:31:19 +1000, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net> wrote:
> Having miPointerMove and miPointerMoved is confusing, especially since both
> do the same thing bar the event delivery. Also, miPointerMove calls
> miPointerMoved which indicates some confusion in the temporal alignment of
> cause and effect.

<Bikeshed>
Should we rename miPointerMove too? Perhaps miPointerMoveWithEvent and
miPointerMoveWithoutEvent?
</bikeshed>

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100702/4c73d240/attachment.pgp>