Are we ready for X server 1.9?

[Keith Packard]

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:53:08 -0400, Adam Jackson <ajax at nwnk.net> wrote:

> My patch for 4652 (acked by tiago):

I don't understand why you're moving this code to the BlockHandler --
AdjustFrame should not get called from a signal handler. In the input
processing code, AdjustFrame is called from xf86SetViewport which is
called from ProcessInputEvents; not directly from the SIGIO handler
path.

It seems like this bug hasn't been analysed correctly to me, or that
there's a code path in the server getting to AdjustFrame from the SIGIO
handler in some weird way. NAK.

> and for 28801 (acked by julien):

Applied, thanks.

> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28801
> 
> and ickle's for 29184 (acked by me):
> 
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29184

Applied, thanks.

> I'm still poking at 11503, there's a patch on the bug that's an
> improvement but not a fix.  Given that bug's been there for basically
> the entire lifetime of fb I have trouble getting worked up about calling
> it a blocker.  Still, we'll see what I can come up with today.

I'm good with shipping 1.9 without fixes for 4652 or 11503, but let me
know if you've got something to look at before tomorrow.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20100819/81f6d6da/attachment.pgp>