[PULL] fixes and clean ups for alpha
Jeremy Huddleston
jeremyhu at freedesktop.org
Tue Oct 13 22:22:09 PDT 2009
On Oct 13, 2009, at 20:22, Keith Packard wrote:
> Excerpts from Matt Turner's message of Tue Oct 13 18:48:10 -0700 2009:
>
>> Actually before I sent the pull request I did `git pull origin
>> master`
>> to verify that there were no conflicts, and when there weren't I
>> did a
>> `git reset --hard HEAD^`.
>
> Ok, cool.
>
>> Is this OK? I'm not quite sure that a better way to do it is.
>
> There are a couple of options, but I'm not sure whether either is
> better. The first is to merge from origin/master, and the second is to
> rebase atop origin/master. Any one have strong feelings as to which of
> these three methods is 'best'?
(IANAGE -- I Am Not A Git Expert)
Well, as long as it's not actually pushed somewhere public, I think
rebasing onto origin/master will be more similar to the actual order
in which the changes would get applied when they're pulled into master.
Of course this is all based on what I've been told and my shallow
understanding of git (man pages are easier to read with beer, btw...),
rebasing atop origin/master would be the wrong thing to do since this
is a published tree. Rebasing would rewrite history... and while
rewriting history would certainly be a good thing for my bank account,
it would be a bad thing for git.
On a slightly more confusing point now... what do we do when a patch
gets denied. Say I have a patch that is in my published jeremyhu/
master and Keith decides that he doesn't like the way my code smells.
What do I do now? My branch is already published ... The only way I
can have it eventually merge back into master is by rewriting
history... so does that mean that we should rewrite history on our
~user/xserver trees, or is there a better way to get around that?
Yes, I know about git-revert, but then that would be more ugliness in
the history.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3333 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20091013/d0cd1956/attachment.bin
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list