HAL parallel startup patch for 1.6?

Peter Hutterer peter.hutterer at who-t.net
Wed Feb 18 21:13:04 PST 2009


On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:50:27PM -0600, Robert C. Noland III wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 10:42 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> > Peter asked on IRC whether I wanted the "HAL startup patch" in 1.6. If
> > it's this one:
> > 
> >    config: if we can't connect to HAL, listen for a startup notification.
> >     
> >     If HAL isn't available when we try to connect, the registered NameOwnerChanged
> >     signal handler waits until HAL is available. Once we connected to HAL, we
> >     unregister the signal handler again.
> >     This allows HAL to be started in parallel or after the server has started.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net>
> > 
> > then I think the answer is yes. Can I get someone to take a look at this
> > and see whether there are any concerns about this patch?
> 
> I've already applied this to FreeBSD' 1.5.3 release with no negative
> impacts, only goodness.  It is running in the wild already, so I would
> like to see it in 1.6 so I can drop the patch.

we have it in Fedora Rawhide, no negative (or positive) feedback yet, so
presumably it at least doesn't wreck ppl's machines.

Cheers,
  Peter


More information about the xorg-devel mailing list