[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Grab dev->struct_mutex in i915_gem_pageflip_info

Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
Tue Jun 17 22:34:37 CEST 2014


We could walk of a bad list otherwise when someone concurrently
unbinds stuff for fun.

I've suspected this as the root-cause behind seemingly inconsistent
state, but alas it's not.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 0e0e6b6bffd1..5c029bd53a26 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -513,6 +513,11 @@ static int i915_gem_pageflip_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 	struct drm_device *dev = node->minor->dev;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	for_each_intel_crtc(dev, crtc) {
 		const char pipe = pipe_name(crtc->pipe);
@@ -554,6 +559,8 @@ static int i915_gem_pageflip_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags);
 	}
 
+	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.1.4




More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list