<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 09/02/2025 à 20:26, Carsten Haitzler
a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:20250209192615.ced5835a3e3ca96ed4b211f4@rasterman.com">
<pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">
using mit-shm is entirely a choice by the x client itself. invariably the right
thing to do is try use the mit-shm extension - set up a xshmimage ansds then
try xshmattach and see if you get an error.</pre>
</blockquote>
<span class="HwtZe" lang="en"><span class="jCAhz ChMk0b"><span
class="ryNqvb">If I guess correctly what's happening with my
test: X clients never get this error, and so they wait.</span></span>
<span class="jCAhz ChMk0b"><span class="ryNqvb">Is that it?<br>
<br>
</span></span></span>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:20250209192615.ced5835a3e3ca96ed4b211f4@rasterman.com">
<pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre"> if you do - it's not going to work
(not local) so... fall back to ximages (not xshmimages). if the apps are not
doing this... that's their problem. they are obviously then clients that will
never be cappable of running remotely.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>