<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Hi Chris,<br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 12:15 AM Chris Clayton <<a href="mailto:chris2553@googlemail.com" target="_blank">chris2553@googlemail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
I sent the message below to the xorg annpince lisy yesterday but it doesn't seem to have wriggled through the filters.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, the xorg-announce is being moderated, best is to send your questions to the regular <a href="mailto:xorg@lists.x.org" target="_blank">xorg@lists.x.org</a> list (cc'ed).<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">

Prhaps you could consider my report.<br>

<br>
There seems to be something amiss with the header file /usr/include/X11/extensions/vldXvMC.h provided in this update.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Unlikely, that file has been untouched in the xorgproto repo since it was last moved in 2018, 6 years ago:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/xorgproto/-/blob/master/include/X11/extensions/vldXvMC.h?ref_type=heads" target="_blank">https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/xorgproto/-/blob/master/include/X11/extensions/vldXvMC.h?ref_type=heads</a> <br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">

My package manager (rpm) complains that the header is already provided by libXvMC-devel-1.0.14-1.x86_64. 1.0.14 is the<br>
latest release of libxVmc. I can't find the changes that this new version of the header has undergone in<br>
<a href="https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libxvmc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libxvmc</a>. The diff between the new version and that provided by libXvMC is attached<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That's right, both packages include that header file, that's why the RPM package for xorgproto (xorg-x11-proto-devel) does _not_  include that file to avoid the conflict, see the list of headers from the spec file:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-proto-devel/blob/rawhide/f/xorg-x11-proto-devel.spec#_45" target="_blank">https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-proto-devel/blob/rawhide/f/xorg-x11-proto-devel.spec#_45</a></div><div><br></div>FWIW, I already packaged xorgproto 2024.1 for both Fedora 40 and rawhide.</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><a href="https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-69e16f560f" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-69e16f560f</a></div><div class="gmail_quote"><a href="https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-180e0eb183" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-180e0eb183</a></div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">So you may want to use those directly instead.</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">HTH,</div><div class="gmail_quote">Cheers,</div><div class="gmail_quote">Olivier<br></div></div>