Question about the future of Xorg

[Fungal-net]

Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote:

> On 2025-06-11 03:53, Felipe Contreras wrote:

> > It does seem Enrico Weigelt was the only one, so why wouldn't I
> > contribute to XLibre instead? 1 developer is infinitely more percent
> > than 0.

> Enrico clearly demonstrated in the xserver project he lacks the technical competence to lead 
> Xorg in any useful direction and the social skills to participate in a community project. Don't 
> let that stop you though.

Although it is not polite to speak of people who are banned from the discussion, it appears to me a small group of people just want to lead and own the "next thing" as intolerant dictators without the funds of IBM to pay people to allow it to be dictatorial (as all corporations are, nothing special here).  I can fork 21.1.18 as well, instead of old news, and own it, dictate who participates and who doesn't, but the best I can expect is to still have 21.1.18 still functioning 5 years later.

Too much noise without much purpose is my assessment