Configuring FireMV 2400

Bill Conner bconner at mac.com
Fri Jan 29 07:28:14 PST 2010


On Jan 21, 2010, at 7:39 PM, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:

> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Bill Conner wrote:
> 
>> I've been fighting with get a ATI FireMV 2400 PCIE for several days now and 
>> I've reached a dead end. I was hoping someone has already resolved my issue 
>> or can point me in the right direction.
> 
> 	I have a 2400 MV with only two working heads.  I've been following the 
> issue moderately closely.  However, I'm no expert on xorg in general.
> 
>> Environment details
>> Ubuntu 9.10
>> 2.6.31-18-generic
>> xorg-server 2:1.6.4-2ubuntu4.1
>> 
>> The 2400 is a quad-head board with two M24 chips appearing on separate PCI 
>> slots. In my case 0:5:0:0(primary) and 0:6:0:0
>> 
>> The server has no issue in auto detect mode with the primary M24 and it's 
>> dual heads perfectly. The problem is getting the server to recognize the 
>> second M24. It sees the card but it fails to load:
> 
> 	The problem is, when xorg was refactored to use/create libpciaccess, 
> no-one was testing for support of multiple graphics chips, and it got broken 
> along the way.  This has now been fixed, but only in version 1.7.  You will 
> need to upgrade to version 1.7 before it will work.
> 
> 	I haven't personally gotten around to installing 1.7 myself.  I plan 
> to do this in May.  I'm on Fedora 11, and I'd have to upgrade to Fedora 12 (or 
> go through a lot of hassles recompiling half the stuff on my system).  I'm 
> waiting for F13.  A quick skim of ubuntu-related information reveals that 
> you're on Karmic, which is the latest release.  I was unable to determine what 
> version of xorg is going to be used in Lucid.  That's the advantage of Fedora; 
> it's already had an xorg 1.7-using version out for months.  It seems to me 
> your options are:
> 1.	Stick with what you have as dual-head
> 2.	Recompile xorg yourself, which I regard as a vast undertaking (but I'm
> 	no xorg expert)
> 3.	Start using Fedora, the most up-to-date distro around ;)
> 
> 	Of course, I could've missed another option there.
> 
> 	Note, also, that I don't promise that xorg 1.7 will work, but I do 
> know that if you ask questions here, the experts will say "upgrade to 1.7".
> 
> 	HTH,
> 

    Thanks for the info. You're right the newer versions of xorg have the multihead support fixed (sort of).
I installed Ubuntu 10 alpha 2. Only two screens came up on auto configure but Xorg -configure generated a working xorg.conf with both chips. 

Now a new issue has appeared. The two heads on the primary interface flash periodically. I remember reading another post somewhere about this issue.

-Bill





More information about the xorg mailing list