libXrender - documentation?

[Beso]

2009/1/26 Thomas Dickey <dickey at his.com>:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
>
>>>> I know that its not easy, but someone can't expect a step-by-step
>>>> tutorial for such low-level stuff.
>>>
>>> hmm - the obvious conclusion is that xft is just a minor/useless library.
>>> Perhaps it should be removed, then.
>> The whole discussion is about RENDER's documentation, not xft.
>
> very well, then apply my comments to "RENDER" (they're both presented
> as libraries that no one should try to use without some other library
> as a sanitizing layer).
>
maybe i'm missing the point: what's the point in a library that needs
another library
in order to be used? i don't really think it's a good idea. maybe it
would be better
to better implement the library in order for it to be used without
another sanitizing
library, that would cost more resources.

-- 
dott. ing. beso