[RFC] RandR 1.3 properties

[Maarten Maathuis]

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Matthias Hopf <mhopf at suse.de> wrote:
> On Oct 28, 08 22:44:35 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
>> Is there any chance to get rid of strings in the protocol/server
>> altogether and stick to standardised "names" and properties (in the
>> form of enums) as much as possible?
>
> Sounds reasonable to me. We should still stick to ATOMs to make this
> extensible, but for the standardized values we should have standardized
> ATOMs.

Just to be clear, i was also referring to output names, which have a
habit to be slightly different pretty much everywhere.

>
> Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Hopf <mhopf at suse.de>      __        __   __
> Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg   (_   | |  (_   |__          mat at mshopf.de
> Phone +49-911-74053-715           __)  |_|  __)  |__  R & D   www.mshopf.de
>