Fixed point matrix representation considered harmful
daniel at fooishbar.org
Thu Mar 20 11:24:36 PDT 2008
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 07:10:59PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:48:23PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 09:55:34AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 16:59 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>>>>> OK, so you basically want to specify a 32bit (or whatever) IEEE format
>>>>> without all the nasty parts? E.g. subnormals and exception values?
>>>> Exception values (NaN, +/-inf) should be invalid, but denorms shouldn't
>>>> cause any issues for us.
>>> Except that it complicates decoding for non-IEEE platforms. Think VAX.
>> Are we actually designing for VAX these days? There aren't many other
>> non-IEEE platforms that I know of: even lame embedded/consumer chips are
>> pretty much all IEEE now, TTBOMK.
> Of course... The BSDs run happily on Vaxen and a Vax still deserves
> a modern operating system and a decent graphics environment.
Right. If it's impossible to do it on VAX, then that's an issue. If
it's _hard_ to do on a VAX ... well, so is everything else. Life's
tough on marginal platforms.
There's a huge difference between designing to include all platforms,
and optimising for ridiculously tiny corner cases (of which VAX is one:
how many are still in use by people who wish they could do arbitrary
transforms in software, compared to others?).
> The world is not all IEEE, as much as it is not Linux/i386 only..;)
A vastly more significant portion of the world is non-Linux/i386/x86_64
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the xorg