[PATCH 1/2] Since G965 class hardware has overlay too, enable it

[Kevin Downey]

On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Robert Lowery <rglowery at exemail.com.au> wrote:
> > On Friday, February 29, 2008 9:12 am Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>  >> From 140320b85c634ad58701243fde3ff41cdcf1863d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>  >> From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky at gmail.com>
>  >> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:31:35 +0200
>  >> Subject: [PATCH] Since G965 class hardware has overlay too, enable it
>  >>
>  >> *replace explicit checks for G965 for having no overlay since it has
>  >> one,
>  >>  with general check for future chips that may have no overlay.
>  >>
>  >> *make overlay registers to be mapped correctly for G965
>  >> *remove a check for register bit that isn't present on G965
>  >> "(INREG(pipeconf_reg) & PIPEACONF_DOUBLE_WIDE)"
>  >
>  > Awesome, thanks Maxim.  I hacked up this patch a little and pushed it as
>  > 5915c75422c5277d530e7f8ecbdfe94654706efd.  Please test it out and make
>  > sure
>  > everything's ok.  I ended up killing the HW_HAS_OVERLAY check (should be
>  > easy
>  > enough to add back in later if needed) since we don't seem to need it at
>  > all
>  > right now.
>  >
>  > I'll hold off on pushing the textured video disable option unless there's
>  > lots
>  > of demand, since users can already select which port they want in their
>  > applications.
>
>  Jesse,
>
>  I believe mythtv will always use the first port so without a change to
>  myth, the textured video disable option is required
>
>  -Rob
>
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > Jesse

Maybe the order of the ports could be switched?


-- 
The Mafia way is that we pursue larger goals under the guise of
personal relationships.
    Fisheye