[ANNOUNCE] xedit 1.1.1

[Paulo Cesar Pereira de Andrade]

Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Paulo Cesar Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>
>> Corrects missing util.h in xedit-1.1.0 tarball.
>> For packagers, non implicit dependencies are:
>>
>>   x11-bitmaps (xorg/data/bitmaps),
>>   aspell, aspell-en, grep, words, ctags,
>>   x11-font-alias (xorg/fonts/alias),
>>   x11-font-dec-misc (xorg/fonts/dec-misc),
>>   x11-font-misc (xorg/fonts/misc),
>>   x11-font-adobe-75-dpi (xorg/fonts/adobe-75dpi),
>>   x11-font-adobe-100-dpi (xorg/fonts/adobe-100dpi),
>>   x11-font-bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi (xorg/fonts/bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi),
>>   x11-font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi 
>> (xorg/fonts/bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi),
>>   x11-font-bh-75dpi (xorg/fonts/bh-75dpi),
>>   x11-font-bh-100dpi (xorg/fonts/bh-100dpi)
>
> Does this means it requires the following but configure doesn't fail 
> if not installed?
>
> (If so that seems wrong since aspell should not be required and my well 
> working desktop doesn't even have x11-font-bh-75dpi, x11-font-bh-100dpi, 
> x11-font-bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi, x11-font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi, 
> or x11-font-dec-misc installed.)
>
> Or does it mean these are optional?
  They are optional.
  It should work with standard ispell and aspell. The original code was
for ispell, and I updated it to work correctly with aspell.
  Most of the fonts are required for the html and sgml syntax highlight
modes. But those could also be redefined, for example, dec-misc is only
used inside <screen> tags in sgml mode.

Paulo