[Fwd: xorg Digest, Vol 36, Issue 17]

Regina regina.apel at gmx.de
Thu Jul 3 02:27:12 PDT 2008



-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: 	xorg Digest, Vol 36, Issue 17
Datum: 	Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:06:50 -0700
Von: 	xorg-request at lists.freedesktop.org
Antwort an: 	xorg at lists.freedesktop.org
An: 	xorg at lists.freedesktop.org



Send xorg mailing list submissions to
	xorg at lists.freedesktop.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	xorg-request at lists.freedesktop.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	xorg-owner at lists.freedesktop.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of xorg digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Further notes on 7.4 (Dan Nicholson)
   2. cairo with glitz vs Xrender (Mohan Parthasarathy)
   3. Re: ati-6.9.0 unstable dualhead (Simon Thum)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 15:00:21 -0700
From: "Dan Nicholson" <dbn.lists at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Further notes on 7.4
To: " R?mi Cardona " <remi at gentoo.org>
Cc: xorg at lists.freedesktop.org
Message-ID:
	<91705d080807021500i5ab3f858h331b3be812f74a97 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:11 AM, R?mi Cardona <remi at gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> Would it be advisable to tell all those packages to use only pkg-config,
> ie through a formal deprecation of the AC_PATH_X macros?

Fallback on AC_PATH_X and friends. It's pretty straightforward.
Without actually testing:

PKG_CHECK_EXISTS([x11],
    [PKG_CHECK_MODULES([X], [x11])],
    [AC_PATH_XTRA])

That would give you $X_CFLAGS and $X_LIBS in both cases. There'd
probably be a little more error checking, but that's the gist of it.

--
Dan


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 15:02:03 -0700
From: "Mohan Parthasarathy" <suruti94 at gmail.com>
Subject: cairo with glitz vs Xrender
To: xorg at lists.freedesktop.org
Message-ID:
	<89dd3da60807021502m619443ecs6c9a7ebd0a10da5d at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,

I understand that Cairo uses Xrender and on the server side EXA provides the
acceleration. I also see that
glitz, which is not actively developed any more, used GLX with OpenGL on the
server side for acceleration.
I am trying to understand as to whether one is better over the other. As we
already use the 3D driver on
the Xserver today for other purposes, it might be possible that we use that
instead of EXA.  I miss a lot
of history. So, can someone provide insight into this ?

thanks
mohan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20080702/2a7da097/attachment-0001.htm 

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:06:44 +0200
From: Simon Thum <simon.thum at gmx.de>
Subject: Re: ati-6.9.0 unstable dualhead
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com>
Cc: Sebastian Glita <glseba at yahoo.com>, xorg at lists.freedesktop.org
Message-ID: <486BFBF4.2000407 at gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Simon Thum <simon.thum at gmx.de> wrote:
>> But 6.9 + 1.4.2 was worst yet. Impossible to use.
>>
> 
> Are you saying the xserver makes a difference?  One thing you might
No, that just happens to reflect day-to-day and development instances.

> for your monitor.  A lot of DVI monitors are pretty picky about the
> timings they like.  if you post your xorg log I'll take a look.  If
> you see differences between 6.8.191 and 6.8.192/6.9.0 let me know, as
> I made some changes to the pll code.
Saw that. FWIW, the first start with git ati .192 made my LCD do 
something I never saw: A box telling me that the mode needs to be below 
1280x1024/75 hz. However this was unreproduceable. Aside from that, it 
seems to work.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Xorg.0.log
Type: text/x-log
Size: 67556 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20080703/b5f589f4/attachment.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Xorg.1.log
Type: text/x-log
Size: 33882 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20080703/b5f589f4/attachment-0001.bin 

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
xorg mailing list
xorg at lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg

End of xorg Digest, Vol 36, Issue 17
************************************





More information about the xorg mailing list