RandR 1.3 additions?

[Maarten Maathuis]

On 1/22/08, Matthias Hopf <mhopf at suse.de> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 08 16:57:24 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> > I'd prefer a property similar to a crtc, a simple bitmask, how this is
> > exposed to the outside world i do not care.
>
> How would you encode this bitmask? What should it represent?
> If these two properties can be encoded this way on the driver side,
> sure, why not, but I don't understand why you need a bitmask, all that
> is needed are two integers per output.
>
> Curious
>
> Matthias
>
> --
> Matthias Hopf <mhopf at suse.de>      __        __   __
> Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg   (_   | |  (_   |__          mat at mshopf.de
> Phone +49-911-74053-715           __)  |_|  __)  |__  R & D   www.mshopf.de
> _______________________________________________
> xorg mailing list
> xorg at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
>

Let me rephrase, some standard integer, that the server is aware of
and acts on, that has a similar functionality as the crtc. E.g., if it
changes it redoes the modeset, it doesn't try to modeset when a
conflict occurs (some outputs are mutually exclusive).