RandR 1.3 additions?

[Keith Packard]

On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 02:04 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
>  I would argue that connectors
> are a better choice as that's what the user sees.

Right, I want to at least allow the details of the hardware to be hidden
by default and communicate with the user in terms of visible physical
objects.

> 
> the outputs would still handle the detect() functionality, and they
> would choose the encoder.  A driver that didn't want to use the
> encoders abstraction would still work so drivers could gradually
> update or not.

I'm not sure we need anything other than an output property that selects
the desired encoder; is there something extra here?

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20080122/039beedd/attachment.pgp>