10-50% CPU used by xorg?

[Clemens Eisserer]

Hi Eric,

> EXA is bound to be slow on 965 until we land the render fixes (currently
>  sitting on intel-batchbuffer, but we could probably just cherry-pick
>  them out since they're orthogonal to the batchbuffer work).  But if
>  you're seeing issues on 915 or earlier, the only improvement we're
>  expecting to see is from TTM-backed buffers, which might help if you're
>  limited by migration (or might not).

So does that mean GMA950 based chips will not benefit of the batchbuffer work?
I got several different answers to this questions, some say "yes it
will", others say "only 965".

It would be great if you could clearify this.

Thanks, lg Clemens