[newb] Will xorg still allow non-hal config?
galibert at pobox.com
Mon Dec 1 05:36:00 PST 2008
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 02:05:24PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Lun 1 décembre 2008 13:44, Olivier Galibert a écrit :
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:40:57PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> >> As usual, people who care about something are free to maintain it in
> >> good shape, since this is how free software works.
> > What is there to maintain, exactly?
> Fonts are not generated out of thin hair and they need to be updated
> to keep up with the environment.
> Environment changes can be changes in encoding standards (unicode is
> still evolving and even low-level hardware stuff such as USB
> identifiers uses unicode),
The bdf fonts use unicode.
> changes in font formats (use the same
> format as everyone else if you want to tap in the common maintenance
You plan to change bdf/pcf?
> changes in hardware capabilities (hardware pixel density is not
> a physical constant and any change there invalidates the existing pool
> of bitmap fonts).
Bitmaps don't change. A 12pt bitmap font at 100dpi is a 8pt font at
150dpi and a 6pt at 200dpi.
> If you think there's nothing to maintain don't complain if maintenance
> is not done and things break in a few years. Fonts require maintenance
> just like every other part of the software stack.
Looking at the git changelog for adobe-100dpi you're way overstating
the number of changes.
More information about the xorg