New handling of privates [was: Re: xf86-video-intel 2.5 release planning]

[Keith Packard]

On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 13:56 -0400, Eamon Walsh wrote:

> Yes, this consolidation should be done.  I also have the OK from Peter 
> to remove some DIX-level keys associated with the MPX merge.  And 
> lately, a lot of code has been dropped from master which has cut down on 
> the number of keys.

The private indicies should be allocated per object-type instead of
globally; that way you'd only deal with the number of privates that
could be instantiated on a particular object.

That's the way it used to work.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20080801/a6aaaf21/attachment.pgp>