Ati radeon performances

Matthieu Baechler m.baechler at free.fr
Mon Apr 14 13:21:06 PDT 2008


Le lundi 14 avril 2008 à 13:57 -0400, Alex Deucher a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Matthieu Baechler <m.baechler at free.fr> wrote:
> > Le lundi 14 avril 2008 à 16:31 +0200, Michel Dänzer a écrit :
> >
> >  > > Is there something we can do to avoid these migration ?
> >  >
> >  > A good start is usually finding out why it's falling back to software.
> >  > You can change RADEON_TRACE_FALL to 1 in
> >  > xf86-video-ati/src/radeon_exa.c, rebuild the driver, re-run the test and
> >  > put up the log file (compressed if it's very big) somewhere for us to
> >  > look at.
> >
> >  I put my Xorg.log there : http://pastebin.com/m2717acea
> 
> see bugs:
> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15371
> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15334

I patched my radeon driver with patches from #15371, and it reduces
migration a lot.
The same gnome-system-monitor test case dropped from 20% to 5% of CPU.
I didn't noticed any regression. Is there something preventing from
pushing it to master ?

While I am at this, the next CPU killer seems to be this one (browsing
the internet triggers this) :

R200CheckCompositeTexture: Unsupported picture format 0x1011000

This time I checked bugzilla, I found nothing about it.


Thanks a lot for your help and your hard work !

-- 
Matthieu Baechler <m.baechler at free.fr>




More information about the xorg mailing list