dbn.lists at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 07:30:44 PDT 2008
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Kristian Høgsberg <krh at bitplanet.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Kristian,
> > I see you already tagged and released xf86driproto-2.0.4 with
> > dri_interface.h removed. It might be too late for this, but I think it
> > would be better if this change could have a bump in the minor version.
> > Bumping the patch number implies that the API hasn't changed, but here
> > a massive portion of it has been removed. That's fine since it still
> > exists in the stack in Mesa, but people working on a more conservative
> > track will inevitably try xf86driproto-2.0.4 + Mesa-7.0.x == no dice.
> > What do you think about releasing this as 2.1.0 (and possibly a 2.0.5
> > with dri_interface.h back in)?
> I would rather not... dri_interface.h and the XF86DRI prototypes
> should not be in a proto module and nothing should rely on it being
> there. Does 7.0.x really not compile with this? Mesa has the XF86DRI
> prototypes in xf86dri.h in src/glx/x11 and dri_interface.h in
Oh, you're right. Nevermind.
More information about the xorg