xserver: Branch 'master' - 2 commits
Keith Packard
keithp at keithp.com
Wed Oct 17 06:00:43 PDT 2007
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 14:24 +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> Is there any reason why you chose this solution, instead of the more
> logical one that requires no additional mode typing?
The problem was where we had an EDID mode that was preferred by the user
over the monitor's preferred mode. In effect, we have
M_T_PREFERRED -- *driver* preference
M_T_USERPREF -- *user* preference
So, I've got modes that are
M_T_DRIVER | M_T_PREFERRED
M_T_DRIVER | M_T_USERPREF
M_T_DRIVER | M_T_PREFERRED | M_T_USERPREF
I don't have any modes that are:
M_T_USERDEF
at all.
I think the source of the preference is separate from the source of the
mode definition. We rarely have users defining modes now, but we still
have users preferring modes that the driver has defined.
I couldn't figure out how to make this work with the existing set of
bits.
--
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20071017/e4dc98c0/attachment.pgp>
More information about the xorg
mailing list