On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:45:35AM +0200, Ra?l S?nchez Siles wrote: > Maybe I'm too daring, but IMHO I wouldn't consider current git (at least 30 > Sept one) and hence 2.1.2 stable with this bug alive: > 2.1.x branch is a cherry-picked version of a previous head (sans fbc stuff).