EXA distorts windows

Paulo J. Matos pocm at soton.ac.uk
Tue Jun 26 04:22:31 PDT 2007


On 6/25/07, Paulo J. Matos <pocm at soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 6/25/07, Michel Dänzer <michel at tungstengraphics.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 10:31 +1000, Daniel Kasak wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 13:06 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > >
> > > > It doesn't matter whan you start it, the point is that when it's
> > > > running, things should generally be faster with EXA than with XAA.
> > >
> > > Does this apply to Intel graphics chips yet? For me things are MUCH
> > > slower with EXA - with and without a compositing manager.
> >
> > Which chipset exactly? IME i915 and i945 are pretty smooth with current
> > master branches of xserver and xf86-video-intel, but Carl Worth recently
> > discovered inefficiencies in the i965 specific EXA driver code, and I'm
> > not sure about the status of i8xx.
> >
>
> radeon mobility 7500, chipset of rv200...
>

Opps, now I noticed the question was not for me. :-)

> >
> > --
> > Earthling Michel Dänzer           |          http://tungstengraphics.com
> > Libre software enthusiast         |          Debian, X and DRI developer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > xorg mailing list
> > xorg at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
>
>
> --
> Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at soton.ac.uk
> http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/pocm
> PhD Student @ ECS
> University of Southampton, UK
>


-- 
Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at soton.ac.uk
http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/pocm
PhD Student @ ECS
University of Southampton, UK



More information about the xorg mailing list