EXA distorts windows

[dragoran]

Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> On 6/21/07, Michel Dänzer <michel at tungstengraphics.com> wrote:
>   
>> It doesn't matter whan you start it, the point is that when it's
>> running, things should generally be faster with EXA than with XAA.
>>
>>     
>
> Here's my very simple benchmarks done with gtkperf, the first run
> after starting 'xcompmgr' at the command line, the other one after
> killing the xcompmgr that was running.
> GtkEntry - time:  0.13
> GtkComboBox - time:  9.81
> GtkComboBoxEntry - time: 12.81
> GtkSpinButton - time:  2.16
> GtkProgressBar - time:  1.31
> GtkToggleButton - time:  3.09
> GtkCheckButton - time: 13.16
> GtkRadioButton - time:  6.32
> GtkTextView - Add text - time:  2.71
> GtkTextView - Scroll - time:  1.64
> GtkDrawingArea - Lines - time: 16.27
> GtkDrawingArea - Circles - time: 21.05
> GtkDrawingArea - Text - time:  2.59
> GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs - time:  2.17
>  ---
> Total time: 95.24
>
>
> GtkEntry - time:  0.11
> GtkComboBox - time:  5.18
> GtkComboBoxEntry - time:  3.95
> GtkSpinButton - time:  0.72
> GtkProgressBar - time:  0.56
> GtkToggleButton - time:  4.03
> GtkCheckButton - time:  9.52
> GtkRadioButton - time:  6.44
> GtkTextView - Add text - time:  1.49
> GtkTextView - Scroll - time:  0.94
> GtkDrawingArea - Lines - time:  1.46
> GtkDrawingArea - Circles - time:  0.95
> GtkDrawingArea - Text - time:  1.70
> GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs - time:  2.80
>  ---
> Total time: 39.88
>
> With xcompmgr running is at least twice as slow. :-(
>   
you should test with the compositemanager running in both cases (with 
EXA and with XAA).