Simon Thum wrote: > Hi Peter, > > I think I've found a followup: > Again in getdctl.c, l. 300: > case DEVICE_CORE: > total_length = sizeof(xDeviceCoreCtl); > > Shouldn't that, if only for consitency, refer to xDevice*State? I don't > think those stuctures are actually diffently sized, but they differ for > sure. pushed, thanks. Cheers, Peter