Xorg Input Hotplugging
Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Mon Dec 3 10:15:21 PST 2007
Le lundi 03 décembre 2007 à 19:59 +0200, Daniel Stone a écrit :
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 06:53:26PM +0100, ext Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Le lundi 03 décembre 2007 à 19:37 +0200, Daniel Stone a écrit :
> > > <merge key="input.xkb.layout" type="string">gb,ru</merge>
> > > <merge key="input.xkb.variant" type="string">,winkeys</merge>
> >
> > Is the , before winkeys needed?
>
> Yes, otherwise you'll have gb(winkeys) and ru; not gb and ru(winkeys).
That is seriously broken and user-unfriendly XML :(. Has it been written
by gconf developers? Is it not possible to do something more intuitive
like
<merge sys="input.xkb"/>
<layout value="gb"/>
<layout value="ru">
<variant value="winkeys"/>
</layout>
</merge>
ie something that actually uses XML hierachical nature to describe
hierarchies? I mean what's the point of inflicting tags on users if
they're not even used to tokenise properties properly.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20071203/62c5515f/attachment.pgp>
More information about the xorg
mailing list