EXA

[Lukas Hejtmanek]

On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 05:02:36PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >     800 reps @  11.4473 msec (    87.4/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
> 
> I'm getting better results and a profile that's wildly different from
> yours. Please try to find out where memcpy is getting called from for
> you.

If sysprof can be trusted, it has the following calls sequence:

ProcShmPutImage
miShmPutImage
damageCopyArea
exaCopyArea
fbDoCopy
fbCopyRegion
exaCopyNtoN
exaDoMigration
exaMoveOutPixmap
exaCopyDirtyToSys
exaMemcpyBox
memcpy

-- 
Lukáš Hejtmánek