[ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.0.0

[Keith Packard]

On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 17:09 +0800, JM Ibanez wrote:

> I'm pretty sure the patch fixes it, but I need other people to also
> confirm it. I've tested it against an i852GM (my laptop), and some
> others have also. I'm just wondering what the official word on the patch
> is. :)

Yup; it's more useful than the current code, but I'd like to see it work
a bit differently before we close this issue. I looked at the code
yesterday for quite a while before deciding that it needed even more
repair than you had already applied. Overlays are a bit of a mess...

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20070420/fc9a2cf8/attachment.pgp>