SIMD-less render optimizations

[Keith Packard]

On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 22:45 -0700, Daniel Amelang wrote:
>  Yes,
> you may be 1 bit off (AFAIK) in the result here in some cases, but
> we're going to chop off the last 2-3 bits anyway when we convert to
> 565,

We've really tried to avoid generating different compositing results in
different rendering paths...

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20070418/757bec29/attachment.pgp>