keithp at keithp.com
Tue Apr 10 17:48:36 PDT 2007
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 21:45 +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> I'm not sure whether the framebuffer should have been resized to 768x1024
> in this case, but since rotation is set up per output, I guess not.
nah; it was just a bug in the Randr 1.0 emulation code where it didn't
resize the frame buffer correctly. RandR requires that the whole crtc
fit inside the screen, so you should never see a crtc pulling bits from
outside the frame buffer. Fixed in upstream.
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the xorg