Graphics Driver Frameworks and Security

[Rogelio Serrano]

On 5/26/06, olafBuddenhagen at gmx.net <olafBuddenhagen at gmx.net> wrote:

> I'm not saying this is necessarily the X group's fault. Maybe it's the
> GGI group that failed to communicate it properly. Which is why I'm
> trying to get some better communication going. (Although probably I'm
> not exactly the best person for this, considering the quality of my
> communication skills, but well...)
>

I think its better if the software speaks for itself. Marketing will
never make up for technical shortcomings. People need programs that
just work. The software i like the most are those that requires no
configuration and does not require a manual to figure out the
interface. Geeks are people too.

I have tried joining several window system projects myself for a few
years but i never went far. I always got lost in the compexity of it
all. I just gave up on the whole WIMP paradigm. In my opinion its just
not the way to go anymore.

> As I already pointed out, I'm not expecting that. All I wish for would
> be to hear as much as "sounds interesting, show us the code", or
> alternatively "we see the following problems with this approach: ..."
>
> Anything giving hope that work done on GGI/KGI (or some similar system)
> won't go to waste.
>

Its not the way things work. Im sorry.

Its really up to the developers. Maybe its time to reengineer.

-- 
www.smsglobal.net SMS Global Ltd Short Message Service For Seafarers