XGL source code error in xorg/GL/glx/glxdri.c file

David Reveman davidr at novell.com
Fri Mar 31 12:35:15 PST 2006


On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 08:42 -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
> David Reveman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 16:21 -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
> > 
> >>Colin Guthrie wrote:
> >>
> >>>Ioannis Nousias wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>hello everyone. I'm new to the list and I hope this is the right place 
> >>>>to post this.
> >>>>
> >>>>as many others did :) I've also tried to compile the xgl-0-0-1 branch 
> >>>>of xserver from source. I was successful eventually, but came across 
> >>>>this error.
> >>>>
> >>>>glxdri.c: In function '__glXDRIdrawableCopySubBuffer':
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Found the bug number:
> >>>
> >>>https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=157051
> >>>
> >>>Col.
> >>
> >>
> >>Is there any risk to applying the CopySubBuffer patch to Mesa?  I.e. 
> >>this one: https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=72841&action=view
> > 
> > 
> > This is the same patch I sent to the mesa list. It should be safe. I can
> > only verify that the intel driver changes works as I haven't tried the
> > radeon changes myself.
> > 
> > 
> >>I was planning on releasing 6.5 tomorrow.
> > 
> > 
> > It would be nice to have the dri interface change in 6.5.
> > 
> > My only concern is that from the last discussion on the mesa list, I'm
> > not sure everyone agreed that this was the best way to go for
> > accelerating partial front buffer updates. I planned on hooking up the
> > sync to vblank code I have for Xgl and make it work with the intel
> > driver to prove that MESA_copy_sub_buffer is the best way to go but I
> > haven't had the time to do that yet.
> 
> I'm happy to check in the patch now for 6.5 rather than hold up progress.

ok, great. let's do that then.

thanks,

-David




More information about the xorg mailing list